Monday, May 23, 2005

Spoiler-free Review

Some requests have been made, and they will be honored.

I thoroughly enjoyed Revenge of the Sith. I was very impressed with it, and I think it is a major step ahead of the first two prequels. I had many gripes with The Phantom Menace, and I thought Attack of the Clones had many of the same flaws but was a great step in the right direction. Revenge of the Sith trumps them both, by far. Herein lies my spoiler-free review.

There is a definite upgrade as far as special-effect quality. The computer animation is top notch, and the interaction with real and cg is almost flawless. Yet, flaws there are. For example, the Clone Commander is a computer generated trooper, yet his head is real footage of Temeura Morrison, the actor who portrayed him. His head seems to float above the computer generated body, and it looks terrible if you watch it closely. On the other hand, Count Dooku's lightsaber fights looked seamless. In Attack of the Clones, his head seemed to glow pale, and the head clearly didn't fit the body moving below it. And cuts from the stunt double to Christopher Lee were badly done. The effect was not a success. Here, in Revenge of the Sith, it is completely seamless. It is utterly believeable that Christopher Lee is doing his own saber fighting, even though he is not. It looked so incredible! Also, another character used a stunt double to do his fighting, and it looked almost as good. As expected, all the effects are taken to the highest levels. There are new cg characters that really look great. Here's a little appetizer: a new character uses multiple lightsabers in a way that has not been done before. You'll go gaga!

This time around, I rolled my eyes scant few times. I don't remember cringing to bad dialog and/or delivery even once. Granted, there are still some goofy lines, and some dull interpretations, but it has been cut down significantly. The love scenes between Anakin and Padme are much more believeable here. More is at stake, and the actors have more reason to be more dramatic. All around the actors have finally embraced their characters and have made them believeable. I was happy that Mace Windu was better this time. The real stand-outs are Ewan McGregor and Hayden Christensen. If ever you doubted McGregor's work as Obi Wan Kenobi, you'll cast those doubts into oblivion by the end. He is perfect. He IS Obi Wan. Contrary to some critics' description of Hayden Christensen as merely a scowl, he pours himself into the role and shines bright. It is wonderful to see him truly become a seasoned Jedi, not just a young boy. And finally, we come to the one behind all this war: Emperor Palpatine. Mr. Ian McDairmid is too perfect this time. Remembering back to his wickedly excellent portrayal of the Emperor back in Return of the Jedi, we are reminded who we are dealing with. Palpatine reeks of malevolence, and he loves every minute of it. His evil cackle is the best in the business. His performance will bring chills to your spine!

I recommend that you read the novelization after you see the movie, then see it again. It will help you understand the finer points of the story and will make the movie better the second time around.

There are scenes that allow for the complete transition to the original trilogy that will bring a nostalgic tear to your eye. Very nicely done, and they will urge you to pop in your Star Wars DVD and watch the films that began this magical journey in a galaxy far, far away....

5 Comments:

At 7:24 PM, Blogger Starrlett said...

The only problems I had with Dooku's fight was the opening CG backflip onto the ship deck--I thought it was very Spiderman 1 over-rubbery CG there. But the rest did look nice. (I do cringe at those clone troopers, dangit.)

Ewan McGregor is, was, will always be the perfect young Obi-Wan. He has the look, the delivery, the personality--he is my favorite part of prequel SW.

I really need to check out the novelization, seems like!!! Are more questions answered there? (Hell-O, Darth Siphodious, anyone?)

 
At 9:35 PM, Blogger Kodiak said...

I agree, the flip down to the deck was pretty weird looking, now that you mention it.

As for the novelization, I think you'll like it. Stover did a pretty good job. I found that I was very interested in what happened next, so I read it fairly fast. Unfortunately, there is no mention of Sifo-Dyas. Once you get into it, it will begin to flow freely. Granted, he's no Jo Rowling, but then again, no one is!

 
At 8:09 AM, Blogger Google HiJacked My Site said...

"How did Lucas lose touch with the wit, the thrill, the fun of the original trilogy and instead offer up a series of plodding, humorless toy commercials? In EMPIRE, the combined writing skills of Lucas, Lawrence Kasdan, and Leigh Brackett gave us the simple and simply perfect romantic exchange of "I love you - I know." In the prequels, we get pages of ham-fisted dialogue that wouldn't pass muster in a Harlequin romance. Every writer knows how vital it is to revise, to rethink, to reexamine. But it seems as if, somewhere along the way, Lucas stopped doing that. Maybe it's that the money has convinced him he can do no wrong. Maybe it's that the power has robbed him of anyone in his sphere of influence with the backbone to say, "George, this is shit. Fix it." - Cinescape

 
At 8:54 AM, Blogger Kodiak said...

Anyone who says that Revenge of the Sith has no humor is blind, deaf, and dumb. I thought the humor in ROTS was better than the first two prequels, and on par with the original trilogy. It brought back some of the fun and spirit. Aside from the goofy voices of the battle droids, and some leftover bad dialog, Revenge of the Sith did an excellent job of bringing back the fun of the originals.

 
At 11:32 PM, Blogger Google HiJacked My Site said...

RO: "You willingly admit to liking From Dusk 'til Dawn??? That right there disqualifies you from making snide comments about Star Wars Episode III!

Aside from Harvey Keitel, everything in that movie sucked!"

Espella Fires Back: "Your loyalty to a silly has been movie serial is amusing. You simply cannot compare the insipid and dull SWIII to Dusk 'til Dawn, a genuinely fun movie written by the universally acknowledged genius Quentin Tarantino. There is absolutely no contest between Lucas' universally acknowledged poor writing skills and the "Q" man. SW I, II, III were pure story Vicodin. The crisp and clever dialogue alone in DtilD blows SWIII out of the ballpark. Not. Even. Close.

Another factor, my young padawan, DtilD featured Salma Hayek dancing seductively with a white boa in a skimpy string bikini and a bevy of topless vampires. You cannot even compare the gorgeous, Oscar nominated Hayek to flat chested, mono-toned actress Natalie Portman. In or out of a Star Wars movie, Portman plain sucks at her craft. She has only minimal lolita value to me.

To think otherwise leads me to believe you might be gay. If so, that's okay. I've seen you play with light saber and read "Fan Force". Portman's boyish frame must be your main attraction to this vapid and disappointing movie serial." ; )

 

Post a Comment

<< Home